Between Two Giants | How Sri Lanka Can Benefit From India–China Rivalry
Strategic Non-Alignment and A Foundation for Flexibility
Sri Lanka has a long-standing tradition of non-aligned
diplomacy, and this remains a powerful asset in a world increasingly shaped by
regional blocs and power competition. By staying neutral and avoiding direct
alignment with either India or China, Sri Lanka can retain the freedom to
engage with both on its own terms. This neutrality can also position Sri Lanka
as a credible host for dialogue, conflict de-escalation, or multilateral
cooperation between these two powers. Hosting regional conferences, maritime
security forums, or economic dialogues could raise Sri Lanka’s profile and
influence in South Asia.
A Historic Legacy of Mediation - Sirimavo’s Colombo
Proposals
Sri Lanka’s commitment to neutrality and peacebuilding has historic
precedent. During the 1962 Sino-Indian War, Prime Minister Sirimavo
Bandaranaike took a bold diplomatic step by proposing the Colombo Proposals in
1963. She brought together six non-aligned nations including Ceylon (Sri
Lanka), Ghana, Indonesia, Cambodia, Burma (Myanmar) and the United Arab
Republic to advocate for a peaceful resolution. The proposals were a set of
recommendations including mutual troop withdrawals and resumption of dialogue to
resolve the Sino-Indian border conflict. Though the plan wasn’t fully adopted,
her effort demonstrated that even a small country could play a constructive
mediating role in international conflicts. Her legacy reinforces that Sri Lanka
can remain neutral while actively promoting regional stability.
Dual Investment Channels - Maximizing Economic Benefits
China has made significant infrastructure investments in Sri
Lanka, including the Colombo Port City and Hambantota Port, while India
continues to be one of Sri Lanka’s top trade partners and investors,
particularly in energy, railways, tourism, and education. Rather than favouring
one over the other, Sri Lanka can use this dynamic to negotiate better terms,
ensure transparency, and attract competitive financing. Encouraging third-party
partnerships involving countries like Japan or the UAE can also help avoid
dependency and increase leverage. A balanced investment approach would
strengthen Sri Lanka’s economy while preserving its strategic autonomy.
Connectivity as a Regional Hub
Sri Lanka’s location makes it a natural connectivity hub
between South and Southeast Asia. Both India and China are pushing connectivity
initiatives as India through BIMSTEC and SAGAR and China through the Belt and
Road Initiative (BRI). Sri Lanka can position itself as a transshipment hub and
a key player in regional maritime trade. By upgrading its ports, airports and
digital infrastructure with support from both countries, Sri Lanka can become
the “Switzerland of South Asia” neutral, connected and indispensable to
regional logistics.
Leverage for Human Capital and Technology Transfer
Beyond infrastructure, India and China are both expanding their soft power through scholarships, cultural exchange programs, and training opportunities. Sri Lanka should maximise this by encouraging student exchange, academic partnerships, and technology cooperation in health, IT and renewable energy. The country can also aspire to become a regional educational hub, offering affordable, English-medium higher education for students from neighbouring nations. Investing in human capital now will yield long-term benefits that extend far beyond short-term funding or aid.
Balance - Not Blind Engagement
Despite the potential benefits, Sri Lanka must exercise
caution. Overreliance on one country can lead to debt dependency, political
pressure or loss of strategic assets as seen in past controversies. To avoid
such outcomes, Sri Lanka should prioritize transparency in deals, environmental
and social safeguards, and institutional oversight. Agreements must be based on
sovereignty-first principles and aligned with long-term national interests. The
government must also engage with civil society and local communities to ensure
that foreign-backed projects deliver real and equitable benefits.
Final Thoughts
Sri Lanka is not merely a passive observer in the
India–China rivalry. With wise leadership and a non-aligned, nationally focused
strategy, it can be an active player that turns tension into opportunity. The
country can attract investments, serve as a regional connector and promote
peace. In today’s competitive world, the smartest choice is not to choose sides
but to stand firm on a path that prioritizes sovereignty, sustainability and
strategic balance.
By Chandima Wanniarachchi | Global Dispatch

Very insightful - Kumari
ReplyDeleteThank you, Kumari
DeleteA timely and thoughtful article for Sri Lanka’s future
ReplyDeleteThank you, Kalana
DeleteA real eye opener! Well done Chandima
ReplyDeleteThank you, Chathuri
DeleteYour balanced perspective shows how Sri Lanka can skillfully navigate great power rivalries for national gain.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Shandhiya! Navigating great power dynamics wisely is key and I’m glad the article sparked that reflection
DeleteThe present rulers manage to be successfully benefitted from these two giants by their strategic approaches.
ReplyDeleteYes Nithyakala, I somewhat agree with you
Delete